Expedition Packs
On This Page
Top Picks
How we choose: The best expedition packs highlighted here were selected based on 1,462 reviews of 442 products. Our top picks are those that are readily-available in the United States and have received the highest overall ratings from reviewers.
How we test: Trailspace is powered entirely by our community of readers. The reviews posted here reflect the real-world experiences of outdoor enthusiasts just like you.
If you've used a expedition pack that you think should be listed here, please share your experience.
Disclosure: Trailspace never accepts payment for gear reviews, product placement, or editorial coverage. When you buy through affiliate links on our site, Trailspace may earn a small commission, which helps cover the costs of running the site.
Deuter Aircontact 75+10
Great expedition backpack. Works exceptionally well under heavy weight for long distances. Pack is very adjustable, giving me the confidence to carry a heavy load and navigate over tricky mountain terrain. Very good construction and materials, creating a durable and strong pack. Looks good.
Reasons to Buy
- Highly adjustable
- Large volume capacity
- Internal frame, shoulder straps and hip belt design
- Comfort under heavy load
- Quality of construction and materials used
- Light for its capacity to load
Reasons to Avoid
- Better design for hydration bladders
- Map pocket is located on front of pack. I use an alternate location for accessibility.
After research on the Deuter Aircontact 75+10 and discussion with others on the mountains. I made the purchase last fall and have come to love this backpack and give it monumental trust. I noticed a prevailing negative feature on other reviews for this pack is the heavy weight. I will discuss this point first and then move to other positive features. The pack is Deuter’s solution to an expedition pack. Our expeditions typically are four days plus. This is where the Aircontact 75+10 excels — and it justifies the ‘bit on the heavy side’ comment.
Read more: Deuter Aircontact 75+10 reviews (16)
Gregory Baltoro 75
A good beginner pack that is durable and well made.
Reasons to Buy
- Durable and handles everything you pack well
- Plenty of pockets
- Comfortable when properly fitted.
Reasons to Avoid
- Heavier then I would like
- Not clearly stated that the 75 Liter is only for the Large Frame pack. Medium is 73 and small 71 Liters
- Does not have a lifetime guarantee like the Osprey
A good beginner pack that is durable and well made... Fit: The pack when fitted well is very comfortable to wear. I wore it backpacking into the Grand Canyon and it served me well. Comfort: Very comfortable to wear. Once on, I almost forget it is there. Capacity: When going into a reseller they advised me that the capacity of all sizes were the same and that is not true. The large is 75 liters, the medium 73 liters, and the small 71 liters. This is not the fault of the pack but rather the sales staff at the store.
Read more: Gregory Baltoro 75 reviews (6)
Mystery Ranch Terraplane
The new Terraplane is an excellent pack for expedition use and other “heavy hauler” users, where it is necessary to haul loads up to 80 or more pounds and still be comfortable. The various Terraplane versions have developed a well-deserved reputation for stability and comfort for these situations. Best used for expeditions, and other extended backpacking uses where heavy loads will be carried.
Reasons to Buy
- Very comfortable and stable with heavy loads
- Very well laid out with pockets, daisy chain, other features really usable
- Top flap has 2 large pockets, crampon bag attachment, and can be used as a fannypack
Reasons to Avoid
- No map/notebook pocket (my old Terraplane OK had one).
- Lacks easy way to attach shovel. (Beavertail accessory for original Terraplane doesn’t fit)
- Would like sleeping bag compartment a bit larger (my Feathered Friends -40° bag plus NeoAir mattress are a tight fit together)
Weight: 6.8 lb/3.1kg Capacity: 5000 cu-in/82 L List Price: $485 Background: Note: At the request of a number of readers, I have added a pair of photos comparing the front and back sides of my old 1995 and new 2014 Terraplanes below. The first question many people ask about is what size pack should I get, ultralight or big hauler? The simple answer is to first gather what you are planning to put into the pack, then select a pack large enough to contain what you are taking. But, how do you figure out what you will be taking? The answer to that is take only what you really need and is adequate for the conditions you will encounter.
Read more: Mystery Ranch Terraplane review (1)
Gregory Baltoro 85
Excellent backpack, designed for long outings to the ground with heavy loads. Fully recommended for those who carry a lot of weight.
Reasons to Buy
- Durability
- Comfort with heavy loads
- Accessibility
- Rain cover is included
Reasons to Avoid
- It is not light
- Price
After having tried two backpacks in the course of a year (Lowe Alpine Cerro Torre and Osprey Xenith 88) I had the pleasure of buying this backpack in a settlement of Campmor at a price of $200 U$D. After having tried it for about a year, I am very happy with the results it has given me, since the waist adapts perfectly to my anatomy and allows me to walk comfortably with heavy loads (approximately 28-30 Kg). Of course, this load capacity is paid with a considerable weight of the backpack, and if our intention is to walk lightly, it may not be the right choice. Its quality of construction and materials is excellent, and is recommended for those looking for a product with a long useful life. In front of Aconcagua
Read more: Gregory Baltoro 85 reviews (4)
Fjallraven Kajka 75
I have carried large packs (65 to 105 L) in all kinds of environments for years now. The Kajka 75 is more comfortable and easier to organize than any of them!
Reasons to Buy
- two large side bellow pockets
- G-1000 material is tough as nails
- suspension system is amazing
- easy to access H2O bottle pockets
- full front panel opening
- drying area for wet gear
- adjustable shoulder strap width
Reasons to Avoid
- heavy materials
- spendy purchase price
- minimum external lashing points
After carrying the Bora 95 from Arc'Teryx for several years of leading trips and the Gregory Denali Pro on personal adventures, The Fjall Raven Kajka is, hands down, the most comfortable large pack I have ever carried! The hip belt is very easy to tighten and stays where it should be, on my hips, not on my butt. The load lifters moved the weight to different muscle groups with ease and allowed me to extend my travel days from 5-7 miles to 8-11 miles. The torso length can be adjusted with ease.
Read more: Fjallraven Kajka 75 reviews (2)
Mystery Ranch T-100
Best well built and comfortable pack you will ever find.
Reasons to Buy
- Extremely well built
- Very comfortable
Reasons to Avoid
- No clip for attaching keys, wallet etc.
- No hydration pocket in main pack
- no pockets in the belt
First, let me say that this is one great comfortable well built pack. The way this thing rides on my back is like no other. (I own a Kelty Red Cloud, Osprey Atmos, and a couple smaller packs.) The craftsmanship of this pack is way above the others and carries loads of 40 – 60 lbs very easily. It will carry more but that’s all I have put in it so far. It adjusts well to form a comfortable fit on my back no matter the load size. The sleeping bag compartment is plenty big too, with straps to secure it inside the bag and a zippered closure at the bottom of the pack.
Read more: Mystery Ranch T-100 review (1)
Mountainsmith Apex 100
This is a comfortable, huge capacity, well-designed, well-constructed freighter.
Reasons to Buy
- Comfort
- Quality
- Capacity
- Design
Reasons to Avoid
- Could use one more set of side compression straps.
I was looking for a lighter replacement for my Gregory Rainier, and the Apex 100, which weighs about 3lbs less, fit the bill. The suspension is comfortable with loads up to 60 lbs (most I've carried in it), and extremely easy to adjust, even in the field. The main compartment is cavernous, easily swallowing camera gear in its own daypack, along with clothes, food, tent, sleeping bag, pad, cook kit, and fuel—4 days worth with a lot of room to spare. I stash my sleeping bag, pad, and tent in the bottom zip-access compartment, and this leaves a huge amount of room in the upper compartment—more than I've been able to use.
Read more: Mountainsmith Apex 100 review (1)
U.S. Military ILBE Pack
Comparison of the USMC ILBE vs Eberlestock v90 Battleship backpacks with the focus on winter camping usage.
Reasons to Buy
- Heavy almost indestructible military backpack
- Very large
- Carries 120 pounds
- Lots of webbing to attach gear
- Comfortable well designed internal frame
- Many YKK zippered pockets
Reasons to Avoid
- Expensive—can find used though
- ILBE is now found only used
- The ILBE Assault pack is not recommended for winter
For Winter Camping and Expeditions you need a really HUGE backpack. I own both the Eberlestock v90 Battleship and a USMC ILBE pack. I shall compare and contrast these with emphasis on winter camping. Both packs have online reviews on military use, hunting, and expeditions. Both packs have good reviews on TRAILSPACE. Battleship frontBattleship side Battleship Camo The Eberlestock v90 Battleship pack is well known for expeditions, military, hunters, and "preppers" as a bug out bag. There are many YouTube videos.
Read more: U.S. Military ILBE Pack reviews (5)
Osprey Aether Plus 85
For a large pack, it carries well, has lots of functional details, and a modest weight.
Reasons to Buy
- Adjustable on-the-fly sizing
- Large capacity for week+ trips and bulky 3-4 season gear
- Absorbs clunky bear canisters
- Top pocket converts to light day pack
- Includes raincover
- Sizable hipbelt and side pockets
Reasons to Avoid
- A bit heavy at 6lbs
- Zippers on hipbelt pockets are hard to fully open/close with one hand
After several decades of use on many backpack and climbing trips, it was time to replace my reliable and old-school Dana Terraplane pack. I sought something similar in size (~5000 cubic inches), lighter in weight, durable, and with contemporary features (e.g., pocket for water reservoir, hipbelt pockets, removable daypack). I have smaller and lighter packs for shorter trips in reliably good weather (summer). This pack is intended for longer trips and in seasons where bulkier gear for colder conditions is needed.
Read more: Osprey Aether Plus 85 review (1)
Osprey Farpoint 70
Osprey has designed a versatile and quality pack for the urban and travelling yet outdoorsy minded person, but basic flaws such as pocket placement make using it frustrating at times. Although you really get two packs with this one, the separable day-pack rarely ends up being attached to the main pack in actual use, for better or for worse. Despite the moderate price tag, I still recommend this pack as an all around useful piece of equipment.
Reasons to Buy
- Incredible lumbar support and comfortable weight distribution
- Made with quality materials and craftsmenship
- Separable day-pack comfortable as well
- Goes great through the airport baggage system
Reasons to Avoid
- Poor pocket placement and sizes
- Cannot extend or shrink pack size very well
- Day-pack waist strap hangs down
- No water bottle holder on main pack
- When large pack's internal pockets are full pack is lumpy
I traveled with this pack during a four-month study abroad term in China and have used it to do short backpacking trips and car trips as well. I also use the day-pack as my school backpack. I have put 8 months of heavy use into it. The backpack fits very well, like a glove to my body. I am a tall skinny person and I often have lower back pain from carrying heavy loads, but this pack has been wonderful on my back even with heavy loads. The hip belts, sternum straps and shoulder straps are all adjustable and really are comfortable.
Read more: Osprey Farpoint 70 reviews (2)
More Reviews of Expedition Packs
Trailspace reviewers have shared 1462 reviews of 442 different expedition packs.
or add yours
Other Types of Backpacks
Find more backpacks reviewed in these related categories:
Daypacks (under 35L)
Overnight Packs (35-49L)
Weekend Packs (50-69L)
+9 more types
Review Your Outdoor Gear
If you've found this site helpful — or if we've missed something important — please consider paying it forward by some of your favorite outdoor gear.
Why? From professional gearheads to outdoor novices, everyone has an important point of view to contribute. will support the outdoor community and help others find the best gear.
Trailspace reviewers are outdoor enthusiasts like you: hikers, climbers, paddlers, backcountry skiers, and trail runners who share our experiences with the gear and clothing we rely on to get outside. Learn more about Trailspace